To me the chicken came first because i believe in god.

JAZZYJAZZ1213

2008-06-30 16:19:31

egg b/ w/out an egg there woud b no chicken!!!!!!!

CAPPRICORN100

2007-12-28 20:29:53

It my favorite question,and why would you ask something like that??

THEJOKER92

2007-12-15 23:43:34

why would you ask somthin like that?

DKB222

2007-12-15 12:52:50

Actually, by the Darwin's theroy the egg was first. Because, although it evolved into the chicken, that chicken's DNA was the same while still inside that egg. For DNA strands to change while in a mature state is called mutation. And that usually leads to death and shortened life. Or at the very least sterility. Hense, no more chickens. And since an offspring recieves stronger traits from the parent and sinse the chicken and its predecessor were so closely resembling in their genetic make-up, they were compatible with breeding and spawned a new chicken egg. Its all science, do your homework and it all becomes clear.

COLDWARRIOR

2007-12-13 18:27:43

that is by far the easiest question of all time. its has to be the chicken because an egg cannot survive on its own. and if you have only one egg how would there be anymore chickens so it was two chickens.

AMBER314

2007-12-13 14:27:40

no chicken- no egg

SECHS

2007-12-13 14:21:11

If your going by both religon and drawinism the chicken comes first. God supposedly created all animals and drawinism states that it would have evolved into the chicken.

HAPPYHYPERHARO

2007-12-13 08:08:39

*Scratches head*uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.................the chicken.

THEJOKER92

2007-12-13 01:41:32